| Multiple Explanations of One Process | 对于一个过程的多样解释 | |
The concept of “a flying bird is motionless” derives from the Greek philosopher Zenon. He hypothesized that if time is made of many small moments, when a bird is flying it is actually not moving.
I’d rather believe that Zenon’s hypothesis was not meant to build a more perfect world based on such logic but to provide a new way of understanding the world. It demonstrates that uncertainty exists among the order of things, and thus allows us to make more speculations on space. At the same time, Zenon, in the form of questions, led us to notice the incomprehensible in the law of inertia. He made us notice that there are errors and holes in this perfect and reliable world, no matter in what way you point them out. The other part [of the current exhibition] comes from the Chinese lianhuanhua (pictorial or storybooks) named Shuanglong hui (Double Dragons). Lianhuanhua was an important narrative form in China from the 1950s to the 80s. It is also the base and nascent form of the medium of Chinese soap operas and sit-com TV shows. It provides the narrative form of juxtaposing texts and images, and re-interprets history and culture in a formatted, popular, and easily understandable way. Shuanglong hui is an episode from the famous Song dynasty (960-1279) story Yangjiajiang (Generals of the Yang Family). The eight brothers of the Yang family, one by one, disguised themselves as the emperor and his officials to attend dinner parties in enemy countries in order to help the emperor to flee. The ending of the story is extremely heartbreaking but heroic. Their actions have also become one of the most famous canonic stories of heroism in Chinese history. The lianhuanhua of Yangjiajiang, which was published in 1961, re-narrated the canonic scene of Shuanglong hui. It translated and transformed the historical event in the most popular form at the time. It responds to the famous Neo-Historicist theory of “the historicity of literary texts” and “the literary texts of history.” We can only understand history from the “preserved and survived” but not “complete” literary texts. History becomes a medium. It can be repeatedly described at any point in time. History can thus be understood as being incessantly halted moments. The concept of “a flying bird is motionless” gives me a new approach and a new understanding of a “process.” It allows me, in the means of re-constructing an “event,” to experiment with a kind of new connection, including the connection to today’s society and to contemporary art. The entire plan of the exhibition Relativism: A Flying Bird is Motionless comes from a completely closed space. In an environment “detached from the world,” there is no concrete time but well-defined space; there is no concrete objective but well-defined object. The whole event takes place in the canonic model of Chinese martial art, and mixes with an individual’s understanding of his or her “role” as an “actor” or “actress.” It is an imitation in a collective manner and an expression from the unconscious. They perhaps receive some indications and are controlled by some rules, including their behaviors. But there also seem many unplanned happenings directly coming from their bodies … In this particular space, the original and complex historical relationship is simplified to series of consecutive actions, but the narrative space is limited to a singular narrow space, disconnected from its relation with any other place. A segment loses the bigger environment, which is its reference. There are only meticulous details but no background to support the details. The moments provided by the space are only “temporary” histories without any depth. With no particular reference, should the space be interpreted as a square, a battlefield, or a real scene? Because of the openness of the space, its meaning becomes uncertain. We cannot determine whether an event is a conflict at large or a collective representation of the clashes among many individuals. At the same time, “a flying bird is motionless” gives me impulse. I want to build a place with both continuity and discontinuity by using new digital technologies. Will they create an alien place that can contain more dreams and imaginations? It is a reference to the parallel progress of the society. Furthermore, the multiple non-linear narrations offer new possibilities to the visuals. October 1, 2005 |
飞鸟不动”的概念来自于古希腊哲学家芝诺(zenon),他假定,如果时间只是由瞬间组成的话,那么飞着的鸟就是静止的。 我宁愿相信,芝诺的假定并不是要用这个逻辑建立一个更完美的世界,而是提供了一个新的理解世界的方式。它表明在事物秩序之间存在着不确定的关系,由此带给我们对空间更多的猜想,同时,他以提问的方式,让我们注意到存在于惯性逻辑中不可理喻的部分,他让我们感到在这个完美可信的世界中是有漏洞的,而无论你用什么方式指出它。 另一部分,来自于中国的“连环画”故事《双龙会》。“连环画”是中国五十年代至八十年代一种重要的叙事方式,它也是目前支配中国媒体电视连续剧的基础和雏形,它提供了文字与图像并置的叙事方式,并且以一种非常模式化的、通俗易懂的方式重新解释历史与文化。 《双龙会》是中国宋代著名的故事《杨家将》其中的一个事件,杨家的八个兄弟为了保护皇帝出逃,分别化装成皇帝及其大臣去敌国赴宴,结果导致了一个异常悲壮的结局,同时也制造了一个中国历史上最著名的英雄经典。 在1961出版的“连环画”《杨家将》中,对《双龙会》这个经典场面完成了新的描述,用当时最流行的方式对这个事件进行了转译,就像“新历史主义”的著名论断:“文本的历史性和历史的文本性”,我们只能从“保存”下来的文本,而不是“全部”去认识历史,历史变成了一种媒介,可以被反复的从某一处描述,历史可以同时被理解为不断终断的片刻。 “飞鸟不动”的观念给了我一个新的方法,对一个“过程”的重新认识,以及通过重构一个“事件”的方式,去实验一种新的连接,它包括与今天的社会及当代艺术。 《飞鸟不动》的整个计划产生于一个完全封闭的空间,在一个“与世隔绝”的氛围中,没有具体的时间,但有明确的空间;没有具体的目的,但有具体的对象。整个事件按照一种经典的中国武打模式,并混杂着每个“扮演者”自己对“角色”的理解发生、发展,一种集体的模仿和无意识的表现,他们似乎有某种暗示并且受制于某种规则的控制,包括行为方式,但又似乎很多的来自身体本身的偶发——。在这个特定的空间,原有复杂的历史关系被简化为连续性的动作,而叙述空间被限制在同一狭长的空间,与其它空间的关系被切断了,局部失去了整体的参照,只有具体的细节而没有支持细节的背景,空间所提供的片刻是没有深度的“暂时性”历史,空间由于不具体,可以被理解为广场?战场?还是现场?空间的开放性使空间的意义变得不确定, 我们无法去判断,一个事件是整体充满着冲突,还是众多个体之间相互争斗的集体再现?同时,“飞鸟不动”给予了我一种冲动,用新的数字技术去建立一个连续性与非连续性并置的空间,他们是否会产生一个异质的空间?可以负载更多的幻想与想象?它既可以作为与此并行的社会化进程的参照,同时,这种综合的非线型叙事,为影像提供了新的可能性。 2005.10.1 |
©all rigts reserved by Wang Jianwei 2007-2012 *designed by Li Zhenhua |
|